Palms bet: Operator identity and regulatory context
Does knowing the operator tell a reader exactly what a licence permits? No: these are related but distinct parts of the regulatory picture. The operator’s identity helps locate the business, while licence records describe specific regulatory authorisations.
Your next round starts at Palms bet.
The operator profile names Telematic Interactiv Bulgaria AD and gives 2005 as its establishment date. For that reason, a visitor should treat https://palmsbet.co.com/ as a starting point for checking current conditions, not as proof that access is available in every country.
What the operator identity establishes
The available profile also names TELEMATIC INTERACTIV BULGARIA EOOD, so the material refers to more than one legal form. It identifies Telematic Interactiv Bulgaria AD as the operator, but the presence of a second legal-entity name does not by itself explain how responsibilities are divided between the entities. That distinction matters when interpreting regulatory information: a corporate name and a licence reference answer different questions.
The brand’s broader history provides useful market context. The source describes a PALMS land-based presence beginning in 2005, followed by PALMS BET’s move into online sports betting and casino from 2018. This suggests a business that developed across physical and digital gambling, rather than an online-only identity. It is context about the brand’s development, not evidence that every product or venue has the same regulatory status.
Browse the slots. Find a live table.
What the licensing records show
The listed records place casino games and sports betting in a Bulgarian regulatory context. The table pairs each stated activity with its licence reference and the related National Revenue Agency permission.
| Activity | Licence reference | Permission reference |
|---|---|---|
| Casino games | No:000030-11099/18.10.2024 | National Revenue Agency Permission No:000030-10633/03.10.2024 |
| Sports betting | No000030-2878/06.04.2023 | National Revenue Agency Permission No000030-2385/22.03.2023 |
These scoped entries make a useful distinction visible: the source separately identifies casino games and sports betting, rather than treating gambling authorisation as one undifferentiated category. The dates and references identify the records as presented, but they do not establish how long each authorisation remains valid or whether its terms have since changed.
Two additional licensing references appear without an activity scope in the available licensing details:
- Bulgarian Gaming Commission decision No:-74/19.07.2019, alongside licence №000030-3424/03-08-2021.
- Bulgarian Gaming Commission decision No:000030-3647/30.03.2018, alongside licence №000030-6941.
Those entries should not be assigned to a particular game type based on their numbers alone. Nor do the records, by themselves, establish the full territorial reach of an authorisation, the eligibility of an individual account, or whether a particular visitor may lawfully access a service where they live. Operator identity and licensing context therefore complement one another, but neither should be stretched beyond what the stated details support.
